Journalism · Arbitration · Heavy
Field report mirror — removal timeline
Three platforms removed the same local water-test report inside five days. The timeline is public. A provenance challenge put the bundle in arbitration, so the proof is held.
The Arbiter bench is holding the bundle. The hold is not for sale. What was already cleared — the timeline below — stays public. The leaf does not change when the bench closes; the outcome will be a new abstract.
PUBLIC TIMELINE
Day 0. A pseudonymous local observer posted a field report. Subject class: municipal water-test logs that did not match the figures in a published notice. Day 1. First platform removal. Reason given to the observer: "unverifiable." Day 3. Second removal. A mirror was posted the same day. Day 5. Third removal. Day 6. The partner desk hashed the observer's original file and the three removal notices. The hash of the original is in the bundle, not in this timeline. Day 11. A verifier challenged provenance. The claim: the observer had not shown chain of custody for the lab sheet. Day 12. The Arbiter bench opened arbitration. This gateway will not sell the bundle while the bench is open. The timeline stays, because the timeline was already cleared.
This page is not the lab sheet, and it is not a finding. When the bench closes, the outcome is a new abstract. This leaf does not change.
Inclusion
Sibling digests are with the Arbiter bench. They are not sold while the hold is open.